Please note: This page is currently being revised and expanded. In the meantime, please review Mr. Grumet's attorney profile at Avvo.com.
Mr. Grumet has been counsel in scores of cases involving a wide range of landlord-tenant/leasing and related disputes, including, for example, the defense [and prosecution of] simple breach of lease agreements, failure to repair, constructive evictions, the defense of eviction/dispossessory proceedings, breach of the quiet enjoyment of the premises [a right implied in all residential leases], security deposit claims, claims for alleged damage caused by pets (and alleged breach of pet restrictions), damages from mold [though Mr. Grumet has recently decided to try and avoid most mold-related claims], security concerns and even bedbug cases, just to name a few.
Mr. Grumet has also represented (and is currently representing) individuals against eviction/dispossessory proceedings brought by banks and former lenders who previously held a mortgage on the individual's residence and subsequently foreclosed on the property, which usually means that the individual is thereafter considered what is called a "tenant at sufferance" - i.e. instead of being a property owner they are then considered tenants who can be evicted from their former residence.
Generally speaking, challenges to a landlord's title or ownership of the property is not a proper basis for a tenant's defense to a dispossessory action. See, e.g., Davis v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 309 Ga. App. 385 (2011). And the same is true once a foreclosure has occurred, as challenges to a foreclosure sale cannot be asserted as a defense in a subsequent dispossessory proceeding. Vines v. LaSalle Bank Nat. Ass'n, 302 Ga. App. 353 (2010).
So while more often than not these cases are a matter of defending against the inevitable, one important thing that can be gained in the interim is that the client can "buy some time" to try and accomplish any number of other goals, such as purchasing another property [and, though very uncommon, even re-purchasing the same property], preparing to move and even preparing for litigation against the former lender for a claim of wrongful foreclosure. But since it is very difficult for a victim of wrongful foreclosure in Georgia to "redeem" the property - particularly when a bona fide third-party has purchased it for value, without notice of the alleged problems - most plaintiffs will be limited to damages for compensation (as opposed to equitable relief which could restore the parties to their pre-foreclosure positions - i.e. giving the property back to the Plaintiff).
If applicable, you understand and agree that neither I nor my firm perform, nor have or do we hold ourselves out as performing, "credit repair" services as such term is defined under the Credit Repair Organizations Act (15 U.S.C. § 1679 et seq.)[or any other related state or federal law or rule]. Thus, while the end result of certain of my legal services may result in the improvement of one's credit or credit score, to the extent I am engaged by a client to help him or her with any matter that involves the FCRA or other aspects of consumer credit, my services are limited to assisting with legitimate problems or disputes about erroneous or inaccurate information [i.e. reported with "less than maximum accuracy" as defined by the FCRA and caselaw] and, as with all other aspects of my practice, I do not and cannot promise a particular or favorable outcome. Furthermore, if and when I am retained to represent a client in conjunction with a disputed/inaccurate credit related matter [whether exclusively or along with other legal issues], the scope of my representation is not limited solely to or with a view towards "credit improvement". Rather, such matters comprise only a part of the overall scope of my representation. In addition, neither I nor my office is a "mortgage loan originator" or lender as defined by either the GA Residential Mortgage Act [e.g. O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1000 et seq.] and or the Federal S.A.F.E. Act [Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008] and any mortgage or loan related services provided by me or my firm are or would be ancillary to the representation of the client and or otherwise exempt from the purview of same. Finally, neither I, my office nor the facsimile or telephone number(s) listed herein - or contained in any documents or links included or posted on this website - accept any commercial or advertising communications of any kind, which is strictly prohibited, and any provision or inclusion thereof; is not intended as a waiver of any protections granted by the TCPA, JFPA, CAN-SPAM Act(s) or any other applicable laws & and shall not create or give rise to a "business relationship".